《Above the river》What is the verdict in the Hu Yong logging case?

The recently broadcast《Above the river》is particularly popular, and countless viewers are deeply involved in it and cannot extricate themselves.The audience is very eager to know《Above the river》what the verdict is in the Hu Yong logging case. Therefore, the following content is a detailed analysis carefully compiled by the editor for the audience.

《Above the river》, Hu Yong was arrested for logging without a license and was eventually sentenced to one year in prison, suspended for two years, and paid a fine for labor in the form of protecting trees.

Hu Yong was caught by the forest police while cutting down trees without a license.He claimed that he was just helping a friend transport wood, and that this incident was misled by Liao Qiangjun.Afterwards, many villagers were willing to appear in court to testify for Hu Yong, and others in the audience also cried out for Hu Yong's injustice, making the trial process unable to proceed.Due to insufficient evidence by the prosecution, Luo Yuan and others decided to postpone the trial so that both parties could have enough time to sort out the evidence.They will make a judgment after a clear investigation.Su Zhuo received a call from Liao Chunhua, who provided some important information.

Su Zhuo immediately rushed to the Qixing County Court with this information to prove that Liao Qiangjun had applied for a logging permit from the town government.However, due to limited harvest quotas, he still signed a sales contract with a seedling dealer without obtaining a license for personal gain.After the case became clear, Luo Yuan convened everyone to discuss whether Hu Yong should be convicted.Taking into account the difficulties of Hu Yong's family, Geng Nian hoped to be more tolerant to him and exempt him from punishment according to the circumstances.However, Lin Hailan opposed immunity from punishment out of sympathy and insisted on her legal principles.After discussion, Luo Yuan and Lin Hailan reached an agreement.They decided to use Hu Yong's replanting in other places as the implementation method, and considered providing a certain period of voluntary labor on this basis, with the village committee supervising the implementation.Although it is sympathetic that Hu Yong was deceived by Liao Qiangjun, his damage to the ecological environment is a fact, and adults should bear legal responsibility.Doing so can not only replace fines for repaying ecological and environmental losses, but can also sound a wake-up call to the public.

It is filled with beautiful poetic style and permeated with deep humanistic care.The entire narrative is smooth and there is no sense of sloppiness. The connection between shots and scenes is natural and flexible. The above is all about the verdict of the Hu Yong logging case - Above the river. If you think it is good, you canContinue to pay attention to the exciting content of the dialogue course.