《Anatomy of death from falling from a building》Movie plot introduction

《Analysis of Death by Falling from a Building》 has been on the air recently. It has received a good response after being broadcast. The popularity on the Internet is also rising, and netizens are also having heated discussions in major forums.《Analysis of Death by Falling from a Building》The plot introduction of the movie has been the topic that has attracted the most attention from the audience in recent days. Today, the editor will provide you with some content about it.

《The Anatomy of a Death from a Fall》tells the story of Sandra, Samuel, and their visually impaired son Daniel living in a remote mountainous area for a year.One day, Samuel was found dead outside the house, and the police immediately launched a murder investigation.Sandra is charged with uncertainty: is it suicide or murder?A year later, Daniel attended his mother's trial, a true dissection of his parents' relationship.

A couple lived in seclusion at the foot of a snow-capped mountain in France. The wife was a writer. Just after giving an interview, the sad news came that the husband had died after falling from an upstairs window. The person who discovered the husband's body was their blind son..The wife becomes a suspect for killing her husband, and what follows is a large court trial scene, which is also the most important part of the movie.The court trial scene also dissected the marriage life of the two people from many aspects and revealed the hidden pain of life.

The protagonist of the movie, named Sandra, is a slightly famous writer.

After her marriage, she lived with her husband Samuel and son Daniel in a cabin in the French Alps.

At the beginning of the story, she was being interviewed by a female student who came here because of her reputation in the wooden house, and the two chatted happily.

But not long after, noisy music came from upstairs, affecting their conversation.

Sandra said awkwardly that her husband was upstairs.

The two chatted for a while, and the music became more and more deafening.

The interview could only be interrupted at this point.

As the female student left, she happened to see Sandra's son Daniel out walking his dog.

Not long after, Daniel came back from walking the dog.

Downstairs in the wooden house, I encountered a shocking scene“

Bloody, father's body.

The forensic doctor's preliminary autopsy concluded that the deceased's fatal injury was on the head, which did not match the scene of the fall;

This means that the deceased may have suffered a heavy blow to the head before death, and the possibility of murder cannot be ruled out.

In the wooden house where a family of three lived, the father died.

The attic window sill was very high, the man had no enemies, and the possibility of accident or homicide seemed low.

The result is obvious, mother Sandra became the first suspect, and son Daniel became the most important witness.

What’s even more – and horrifying when you think about it – is that Daniel’s vision was damaged a few years ago and has never fully recovered.

Now, the only witness is no longer credible.

The police investigated the scene and reviewed the case many times, and even pushed a dummy from the window to conduct experiments.

In the end, Sandra was brought to court on suspicion of murder.

In addition to the forensic identification results, there are certain discrepancies between Sandra's testimony and the actual situation at the scene.

There is also another key piece of evidence”

In the USB flash drive of the deceased Mussel, there was an audio file, which was a conversation between the couple, which may be related to the case.

Could it be that it was really a carefully planned murder of husband?

There is no God's perspective in this film.

We don’t know whether Sandra killed her husband, but we can see that she is indeed a mysterious woman.

After her husband's death, she had reservations about the police and was very concerned about her son's emotions.

Afterwards, she immediately found her old friend and lover lawyer Vincent to help defend herself.

A year later, Sandra stood in the dock in court.

Facing the prosecutor's sharp questioning, although she was a little flustered, she still seemed to be at ease.

This case occurred within a family and there was no direct evidence, so reason became the key.

Sandra said that her husband had been blaming himself ever since his son was visually impaired due to an accident a few years ago.

Therefore, my husband had been drinking alcohol for a long time and taking antidepressants, and there were a lot of pills in his vomit.

This means that the husband may have attempted suicide before, but this time he succeeded.

This argument was quickly bombarded by prosecutors.

The most critical recording evidence came on stage.

The recording records a recent argument between Sandra and Samuel.

In the beginning, the quarrel was caused by the feud between the parents, who complained to each other due to cultural differences and various lifestyle issues.

Obviously, the two have great emotional problems.

At the climax of the argument, Samuel yelled that Sandra had plagiarized the essence of his work.

Not only that, he also accused his wife Sandra of cheating...

After listening to the recording, everyone can be said to be greatly shocked.

It turns out that not only did the couple's relationship break up long ago, but there were also so many shameful things going on.

But even so, family matters are still family matters. From another interpretation, it seems to be a common problem for both parties.

Was it an accident that ripped open the family's ugly mask, or was it a murder that had been exploited for many years?

In this murder trial where emotion and reason are intertwined, the truth becomes more and more confusing...

The film is perfect both from the director and the actors.Jury chairman Reuben said at the meeting after the awards ceremony that the Palme d'Or was awarded to "Anatomy of Death from a Fall" because it was a very special film that premiered at the Lumière Film Palace.Everyone felt it.Another judge, Brie Larson, said the dialogue in the movie was great.

Director Justine Trier is very young to have won the Palme d'Or at the age of 45, and she is also the third female director to win the Palme d'Or in the history of Cannes. The first two are - Piano Lesson -(Jane Campion), 《titanium》(Julia DiCuno).At the winner's meeting, he said that he was very happy to see more and more young people and women making achievements in this field.

German actress Sandra Wheeler is 45 years old. In 2016, she starred in the comedy film - Toni Erdmann - which was a big hit at the Cannes Film Festival. This time she starred in - Anatomy of a Falling Death 《》Area of ​​Interest--Both films were shortlisted for the main competition.She said that these are two different movies and both are great.

Okay, this is what the editor has compiled for you - Anatomy of Death from Falling from a Building - Movie Plot Introduction. I believe that in the following storyline, you may also encounter some difficult to understand parts, so we recommendYou continue to follow the line lesson.In the future, we will provide you with more latest film and television plot analysis and character analysis to better understand and appreciate film and television works.