《Judgment》 Episode 33 plot introduction

The recent broadcast of "Judgment" has detonated the entire audience market. Many viewers have been discussing it enthusiastically, and even followed the plot to empathize with it, immersed themselves in it, and felt that they were immersed in it.Undoubtedly, 《Judgment》the plot introduction of the 33rd episode is definitely something that the audience is very eager to know and want to know.Therefore, the editor has specially compiled the following content for everyone to have a more in-depth understanding of the audio-visual feast brought by - Sentence -.

Luo Huaigong even used threats to send Su Han to coerce Guo Nian's attending doctor to tamper with medical records.The Public Security Bureau stepped up its investigation.It was discovered that on the day Guo Nian was killed, Qi Heng had no alibi and was in Qizhou.Combined with the complaint letter Su Han forged as Guo Nian's best friend obtained from the investigation by Guo Nian's unit, as well as Guo Nian's medical records, as well as X-rays, forensic reports from that year, etc., the Public Security Bureau had reason to be suspicious of Qi Heng.Qi Heng questioned this.

Qi Heng questioned the Public Security Bureau's suspicion of him.He maintained his innocence and said the so-called evidence had been tampered with.He pointed out that Su Han was Luo Huaigong's subordinate, and Luo Huaigong was his political enemy. There was an obvious conflict of interest between them.Therefore, he believed that these accusations were just fabricated by Luo Huaigong to attack him.

Qi Heng further explained that he indeed had no alibi that day, but this did not prove that he was the murderer.He emphasized that he had no grudges with Guo Nian and had no motive to kill her.He believes that the Public Security Bureau should examine the evidence more objectively instead of casting doubt on him based on just some superficial clues.

Qi Heng also pointed out that the complaint letter forged by Su Han in the identity of Guo Nian's best friend cannot be used as evidence of his guilt.He believed that the authenticity of the letter required further investigation and that he could not be charged solely on its basis.He asked the Public Security Bureau to conduct a more in-depth investigation into the source of the letter.

In addition, Qi Heng also raised questions about Guo Nian’s medical records, X-rays and forensic reports.He believes the evidence may also have been tampered with to serve the purpose of the charges against him.He asked the Public Security Bureau to conduct a more rigorous appraisal of the evidence to ensure the fairness and accuracy of the investigation.

Qi Heng firmly believed in his innocence and asked the Public Security Bureau to conduct a fair and objective investigation into his case in order to restore his innocent reputation.He expressed his willingness to actively cooperate with the investigation and provide all necessary evidence to prove his innocence.He hoped that the Public Security Bureau could find out the truth as soon as possible and give him a fair conclusion.

Why is the letter not the original but a scanned copy?Have you ever done a note appraisal?Why did Guo Nian’s female classmate who provided the letter disappear?The Public Security Bureau investigated and confronted Qi Heng. On the day Guo Nian was killed, Qi Heng went to a meeting out of town. Logically speaking, the drive should only take 4 hours, but Qi Heng took 8 hours.What is Qi Heng doing during this time?

Qi Heng recalled and explained that he misremembered the location of the gas station, which caused the vehicle to run out of gas and stall. He waited for the towing company for four or five hours, which wasted time.

This is the plot introduction of the 33rd episode of "Judgment" compiled by the editor. I believe it will be helpful to everyone. If you want to know more interesting plot content as soon as possible, please continue to pay attention to the line class..