Movie《Article 20》Prototype of the case

Recently a TV series called 《Article 20》has become the focus of attention.Since its premiere, the show has aroused enthusiastic responses from the audience and fascinated countless people.Among the recently aired plots, the movie-Article 20-case prototype is undoubtedly the one that everyone pays the most attention to. The following content is the reference provided by the editor.

《Article 20》In middle age, prosecutor Han Mingren encountered a difficult case and was forced to get involved in controversy. Everyone wants to know what the prototype of this case is. Is there a corresponding case in reality?

Han Ming planned to spend the last stage of his career smoothly, but unexpectedly took over a controversial case.This case involved a man who shot and killed his opponent in self-defense when his life was threatened, but the court ruled that he committed intentional homicide.After understanding the case, Han Ming decided to defend the suspect on the grounds of self-defense.

In fact, similar cases are not uncommon in real life and involve issues of legal fairness and justice.It is understood that 《Article 20》the drama version may be inspired by the 2018 Kunshan anti-murder case (Yu Haiming's self-defense case).

On the night of the incident, a traffic accident occurred at an intersection in Kunshan, Jiangsu Province. Although there were no serious injuries, the man in the car took out a knife and threatened the bicycle owner.Unexpectedly, the knife accidentally fell to the ground. The man on the bicycle picked up the knife and chased the other person, eventually causing the man in the car to be injured and fall in the grass.The next day, the case was announced. The man in the car, Liu Moumou, died and the cyclist Yu Moumou was injured. The case was further investigated.After Liu Moumou's autopsy, the Kunshan Public Security Bureau determined that Yu Haiming's behavior was self-defense and did not need to bear legal responsibility.At that time, the release of videos related to the case process aroused heated discussions among netizens.The man in the car stabbed the man with a knife, but the man on the bike just used the other man's knife for self-defense.However, some lawyers believe that the cyclist's behavior went beyond the scope of self-defense and constituted excessive self-defense.Everyone naturally believes in the police investigation results, but the analysis conducted by the lawyer is only based on the video and has no actual factual basis.

The story of the play is also exciting, and the acting skills of the two protagonists are excellent. It can be regarded as a high-quality work in recent times. The above is all about the prototype of the case in the movie-Article 20-for those who are interestedFriends, remember to watch it, and remember to follow our line class.