《The Worst Roommates Ever Season 2》Episode 2 Analysis: Roommates from Hell

《The Worst Roommate in History Season 2》The combination of camera movement and movement, narrative techniques and situations, and music and color complement each other, deeply engraving some plots into the hearts of the audience.Analysis of the second episode of The Worst Roommate in History Season 2: Roommate from Hell I believe that everyone still has some problems, and today the editor will help you solve your doubts.

《Horror Roommates Season 2》The second episode begins in 2002, when Anita buys her own house in Brown Springs. This house is everything to her, symbolizing her independent personality and unlocking her life.A representative of achievement, but because there is no fixed source of income here, even working part-time at a pharmacy is not enough to pay the bills, so many people who own houses here rent out their homes. Anita omitted the background check in order to save money.This step will allow people to live in the home~

OK, meeting a scary tenant is scarier than meeting a ghost. 《Horror Roommate Season 2》In the second episode of Anita's case, you can tell that this place has more working class people, but I don't want to discuss it here.The working class means the source of chaos, because I personally feel that this is not necessarily the case. Good people and bad people have no absolute relationship with occupation and social status. In short, it is Anita's approach that allows those bad people who want to take advantage to get closer.But what I want to discuss is that when renting out a house in the United States, a financial investigation is required. I looked up some information out of curiosity and found that this is a normal practice in the United States. Before renting out a house, you need to do some research on the tenant and ask some questions., this is very different from renting a house in Taipei, and there are many regulations for landlords in American laws and regulations. There cannot be any racial discrimination. Even if the tenants are in arrears with rent or have problems, they cannot cut off water, electricity and evict them (so it is said in the documentaryEven if Anita has problems with a few tenants, she can't evict them. This was also the case in the last episode of Season 1 [Roommates Wanted]).

But in fact, there is still a certain balance between regulations and practices, because the landlord can conduct a financial investigation on the tenants, and I think Anita’s case has the concept of inviting a wolf into the house, because she did not screen the tenants, just because she did not take such action, so let the danger come to your door. After all, those who want to avoid the net worth investigation basically choose to enter Anita's home because there will be problems with the net worth investigation.But what surprised me even more about this case is that the closer the person is, the more dangerous it is!Because at the beginning, I thought this case might be a case of luring a wolf into the house and bringing a problematic stranger into the home. However, the murderer in this case, Scott, was an acquaintance. This is ironic because people are wary of strangers., always let down your guard and trust people you know, but the irony is that it is always the bad guys who take advantage of trust that are the scariest, such as Scott.And Scott's arrival made Anita only believe in him.《Horror Roommate Season 2》 It didn't say why Anita believed everything Scott said so much, but we are watching Anita from the perspective of bystanders, so if we are from Anita's perspectiveTo understand Anita?

I guess it's probably because Anita doesn't trust Dai Ruo, who is just a tenant, more than an acquaintance. After all, Scott is someone Anita knows from work, so Anita naturally feels that Scott is trustworthy; andDai Ruo also said that he and Anita basically did not have much social relationship, and Dai Ruo basically stayed in the room to enjoy his own space and rarely interacted with Anita, so thisIn contrast, I think it is not difficult to understand that Anita would believe Scott's words more than Dai Ruo.(I think this is why every time Scott brings up the theft that he wants to frame Dai Ruo, Anita will always foot the bill and thinks Dai Ruo is lying, but Anita will help Scott perjury.It’s really exaggerated!).Seeing this, it turns out that there is more than one victim of the Horrible Roommate. After reading the middle part, I discovered that Dai Ruo is actually one of the victims of the Horror Roommate. In the first half of the Horror Roommate Record Season 2, what was toldIt’s the story of Dai Ruo’s victimization. What happened to him was so inexplicable that he even went to jail. But after seeing this, I became even more confused. What benefit did Scott do to him?Actually, I'm not sure, but the main thing I think is that I want to force Dai Ruo away ~ For example, those inexplicable theft incidents at the beginning, and the frame-up of Dai Ruo's criminal record. Such torture to a person, I want to let someone knowIt was difficult to retreat, but because of Dai Ruo's insistence on resisting, the result turned out to be the most extreme method.

I think Scott simply stepped on the loopholes of the legal process and went on to do it - house strike - this kind of behavior also happened in the first season, because in the United States - whether you have a lease or not, whether you have a lease or not,After actually reaching an agreement with the tenant, you are a legal tenant, and no one can ask you to move out. You must go through due legal procedures, which takes several months——, after Scott used means to exclude Dai Ruo from this house., Scott's behavior began to become arrogant. Such legal regulations seemed to guarantee that tenants could do whatever they wanted in the rental house. In the first season, we actually discussed that this kind of regulations should be revised to be real -- Strike the house - The solution is that what Scott did to Dai Ruo was transferred to Anita. I think the purpose is to drive Anita crazy and make Anita leave her own house.What happened to Scott's personality?If what Scott told Rob about his childhood experiences is true, then we can roughly deduce the reason why Scott’s personality is so twisted and anti-social. Rob said of ScottSpecial's father would be violent towards him when he was a child. Domestic violence will have an extremely serious impact on a person's personality. Children who have been exposed to domestic violence for a long time may accumulate resentment and anger due to long-term psychological pressure, and may even begin to have symptoms.Aggressive behavior, coupled with his mother's tendency to euthanize pets, also indicated to Scott that she never wanted to have him.When a child feels that his existence is a mistake from an early age, he will not be full of expectations for the world, but will only be full of resentment and a perpetrator of harmful behaviors. After law school, Scott was addicted to alcohol and drugs.A person who uses these two things is generally escaping from his own life, so he wants to numb himself and avoid pain.

As for the love and help given by others, I don’t think Scott would think of it as love, but would want to take it - use it -.So he doesn't care about destroying other people's lives, things, and lives, because this is the family feeling his parents gave him when he was a child, such as his mother's euthanasia of pets, or his father's domestic violence against him to solve problems and vent.The way of anger, for Scott, this is the way that Scott thinks can solve the problem (for example, he also caught Dai Ruo's cat and euthanized it). Such behavior and personality of shirk of responsibility are just like the following.Just like a domestically violent father, he uses violence to shirk all responsibility.Before Anita's murder, Anita's appeal to the judge for help was tragic. Anita asked the judge for help and wanted to drive Scott out of the house. However, the judge's decision was to drive the dog out of the house, but not to drive the dog out of the house.Are threatening people removed from their residences?This case makes people see how desperate the legal system is. After all, the law protects tenants. A landlord cannot just evict a tenant, even if the tenant is unemployed and cannot pay the rent~Seeing this kind of case again, I really feel sorry for the victims under these laws, because the housing strike case of habitual offenders in the first season has clearly shown that there are problems with this kind of law, but the government has never thought of reforming it, only using it.The owner can pass the responsibility to the landlord for the protection of the tenant's identity investigation. In the end, when Anita asked the judge for help, the court made ridiculous rulings and judgments. When the legal defense line could not save Anita, Anita finally died.We can only face the coming murderous intention unarmed!

This case also satirizes the problems in the American judicial system. In the case, we can see that when the police helped Anita enter her home, they only said that the dispute between Anita and the tenant was just a civil point and no crime had occurred, and then left her alone.Anita is at home with Scott.Judiciary is like this. It only has jurisdiction over things that have already happened. If it has not happened yet, it will not take care of it. In other words, it is known that danger has already happened, but the law has no control!?We have to wait until danger occurs before we know how to be willing. What can fill the ambiguity and gaps in this situation?I think the big problem with Anita's death is the ambiguity in this paragraph.Anita finally recorded the process of her own murder. This is very shocking evidence. What I call shocking is because Anita could only face the violent murder in front of her unarmed. Anita obviously needed to do a background check to screen the tenants. AnitaIt was clear that there was a chance to prevent herself from making wrong choices (for example, she could choose not to commit perjury to drive Dai Ruo out), Anita clearly asked for help, and Anita clearly had a chance to be rescued in advance. As a result, a series of mistakes and misses, Anita andScott and the two have allowed things to reach this point and become an irreparable tragedy.

As for Scott asking for the death penalty himself, the police officer said - innocent people will not ask for the death penalty -, in his own opinion, Scott himself should have lived a painful life. It should be said that I think his personalityHe is twisted to the point of being sick. In him, I think he has a feeling of wanting to ruin his life, because when he was a child, his mother said to him, "I never wanted to give birth to you," so that the meaning of a person's existence can beHe was hit hard, so in his life, he also gave up on having any goals in life, and became a bully everywhere. Alcoholism and drug addiction became the things he had been avoiding in life, so he beat Anita.At the moment, I believe it was caused by losing control of his emotions. It can be said to be murder, because he had long been prepared to be violent to Anita!

The editor has brought a series of details about - The Worst Roommates in History Season 2 - Episode 2 Analysis: Roommates from Hell, which explores this topic in depth from multiple angles. I believe it will be very inspiring and helpful to readers..If you have more questions and needs about film and television, please continue to pay attention to the line class. We will continue to bring you more interesting and practical film and television news and information.